“Thank you, on behalf of the family and myself, for your guidance and aid in my preparations for trial and for your impeccable presentation and expert testimony. Your meticulous, straightforward explanation of the unexplainable was vital to our efforts.”

— Plaintiff Attorney

“The ABSOLUTE BEST with whom I have worked in 30 years. Dr. Hayes is superbly qualified and talks right on the same level with a jury.”

— Defense Attorney

I hope I can impress upon Toby how good Erik is…It's not just that Erik is smart and personable and calm, but he affirmatively called me to make sure we were on track… He was driving his train, which kept the administration pressure off of me…Erik was critical to our success.

-Plaintiff’s Attorney

“Dr. Hayes impressed the court as an expert witness whose testimony was offered with a view toward assisting the court in understanding technical information in a neutral and unbiased manner. He was a very credible witness.”

— Judge, United States District Court

“Dr. Hayes was instrumental in taking a case in which a jury returned a verdict of $832,000, to a verdict on retrial of $640! I wish we had used him in the first trial as the jury loved him. I have learned my lesson and involve his team in my most difficult cases.”

— Defense Attorney

“A few jurors spoke with me after the [Defense] verdict was read…a HUGE part of their decision was based on [Erik Power’s] testimony. They found
him very credible [and] knowledgeable.”

— Defense Attorney

“[Erik Power] did an outstanding job [at a jury trial in 2007]. He was extremely well prepared [and] his testimony and presentations were excellent…[S]everal of the jurors approached me after returning a nearly immediate unanimous defense verdict. [A] juror explained that Mr. Power was the best [of our excellent experts]. He was surprised to hear that this was the first time Mr. Power had ever testified in a trial. ”

— Defense Attorney

“All of the jurors told us they were most impressed with [Dr. Hayes’s] explanation of the medical causation issue…no one had ‘compared the impact from the incident to the impacts experienced in the ordinary activities of daily living’…They clearly felt [Dr. Hayes’s] explanation was the most persuasive evidence they had in 3 ½ weeks of trial and their short deliberation supports it.”

— Defense Attorney, after speaking with jurors following a Defense Verdict